Firing Senator Meredith Does Nothing To Protect Minor Aged Girls From Predatory Men


I have two daughters ages thirty and forty, and two granddaughters ages five and twenty-one.  One of my daughters at fourteen years old fell for an older man, started not coming home at night, and began to have sex with him.  Like any concerned loving parent, I thought that the law was on my side and reported the man to the Montreal police.  I was told that my fourteen-year-old was of legal age to consent and the man had broken no laws. 

I am telling you this, because I know what it is:

  • to be a parent;
  • to have a fourteen-year-old daughter fall in love with an older man;
  • to have the law protect the adult man instead of my minor child;
  • to feel helpless and betrayed;
  • to live my life in fear that the same thing will happen to my granddaughters, because the law has not changed.

What I find to be as disgusting as what Senator Meredith admits to doing, is the fact that Senator Don Meredith, has been found to have broken no Canadian law. Not one of the outraged politicians, news anchors, guest panelists, called for a change in the law that makes it legal in Canada for an adult man to prey on girls fourteen and up for sex.  Everyone is so busy talking about saving the reputation of the senate, that no one is talking about changing the legal age of consent back to eighteen-years-old, and putting some serious consequences for those found guilty of statutory rape. 

Does it make any sense that a fourteen-year-old girl in Canada is considered old enough to consent to sex with an adult male under the law, but not old enough to, smoke, drink alcohol, gamble, quit school, or vote? Does it make sense that as an adult to sell a person under eighteen-years-old tobacco products or alcoholic beverages is a crime, but an adult can enter into a relationship with a fourteen-year-girl and offer to make her a star, or an intern, for sex?

Senator Don Meredith and miss M’s story in my opinion is no different from that of René Angélil and Celine Dion, and yet the story of René Angélil and Celine  Dion is considered one of the great love stories and successes of all time and Senator Don Meredith and miss M’s story is considered to be disgraceful. How can one of these men be guilty of an immoral relationship, so reprehensible that he must be driven from his job, and yet the other be allowed to use his immoral relationship to become entertainment royalty, amass great wealth, and most get a state funeral?

I do not believe that the race card is being played out in the senate, but I do believe that when the senate says it is considering trying to do an end run around its own rules when it comes to the firing of a sitting senator, then it opens itself to the race card and a whole bunch of other problems.

There are rules of conduct in every work place, as there are in the senate. It is important that these rules are applied the same to everyone.  When talking about the integrity, honor, morality of the senate, an institution responsible for helping to create the rules that Canadians live under, how can one breach of the standard be more of an offense than another?

It is important to understand that in spite of the fact that Senator Don Meredith is an embarrassment to:

  • himself;
  • his office;
  • his race;
  • his peers both in the senate and his church, as well as to his family;
  • Senator Don Meredith has of yet to be charged with any criminal offense by any police agency in Canada, because he has not broken any laws.

Under the Constitution, a senator can be removed for five reasons:

  • If for two consecutive Sessions of the Parliament, he fails to give his Attendance in the Senate.
  • If he takes an Oath or makes a Declaration or Acknowledgment of Allegiance, Obedience, or Adherence to a Foreign Power, or does an Act whereby he becomes a Subject or Citizen, or entitled to the Rights or Privileges of a Subject or Citizen, of a Foreign Power.
  • If he is adjudged Bankrupt or Insolvent, or applies for the Benefit of any Law relating to Insolvent Debtors, or becomes a public Defaulter.
  • If he is attainted of Treason or convicted of Felony or of any infamous Crime.
  • If he ceases to be qualified in respect of Property or of Residence; provided, that a Senator shall not be deemed to have ceased to be qualified in respect of Residence by reason only of his residing at the Seat of the Government of Canada while holding an Office under that Government requiring his Presence there.

The end run around its own  rules has never been tried before, by the senate…not even:

  • at the height of the senate scandal;
  • when Mike Duffy was found innocent of all charges;
  • when Senator Beyak spoke of the “good intentions” behind the residential schools system;
  • after Senator Beyak  refused to take back her statement, or give up her seat on the Senate’s Aboriginal Peoples committee;
  • when Senator Brazeau’s was arrested on February 7, 2013, for domestic assault and sexual assault;
  • on September 15, 2015, when Senator Brazeau pleaded guilty to simple assault and cocaine possession as part of a plea deal in which other assault charges were dropped, and he was acquitted of sexual assault.

Some of the things being suggested the senate do about Senator Meredith are listed below.

  • Television programs hosted by the likes of  Rosie Barton, Don Martin, and their regular assortment of political pundits have stated on television that they do not care what the law says and insist that the senate should do whatever is necessary to get rid of Senator Don Meredith.
  • Interim Conservative Party Leader, Rona Ambrose and most of the senators believe the senate should do this end run around the law and the senate rules to end the Meredith embarrassment.
  • The NDP wants Trudeau to put pressure on the senate to change their rules, although the senate is supposed to be an independent and separate entity from the House of Commons.
  • The senate itself has asked their law clerk to look further into Section 18 of the Constitution Act.  Section 18 of the Constitution Act states that Canadian parliamentarians have all the “privileges, immunities or powers … enjoyed, and exercised by the Commons House of Parliament in the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland.” (In Britain, MPs can oust a member of the House of Commons with a majority vote in favor of a motion to remove that person. Section 18 seems to imply that Canadian senators could have that same power).

 Everyone seems to think that it would be okay to violate the existing rules and historical practices of the senate and do whatever it takes to remove Senator Don Meredith. They all seem to agree that they would not like to see this happen too often though…perhaps just this once to remove Senator Don Meredith. I say stop grandstanding and work to change the law that makes girls of fourteen years old easy targets for male predators!

What does it say of Canadian justice and Canadian institutions responsible for creating and passing the laws that Canadians are supposed to live by, if those in parliament and the senate adhere to an alternative, or shadow justice system, which ignores Canadian law and the rights and freedoms guaranteed under the Canadian Constitution, Charter of Rights and Freedoms?

Canada is supposed to be a country that believes in the rule of law. Canada’s belief that that all Canadians are equal and can expect equal treatment under Canadian law, is a corner-stone if not the very foundation upon which Canada’s democracy depends.  The push to remove Senator Don Meredith from the senate by any means necessary, may:

  • look like the right thing to do, surface;
  • satisfy most people’s desire to see him removed from the senate.

The reality is that this is little more than:

  • mob justice;
  • vigilante justice;
  • political grandstanding.

None of the above mentioned will do anything to stop older men from having inappropriate relationships with minor girls.

There will always be men like the man who had sex with my daughter at fourteen, René Angélil, or Senator Don Meredith: Men who do the things that they do and get away with it, because the law is on their side. Until the government stops using this issue as a political football and the law is changed, girls of minor age will continue to be, unprotected by Canadian law, at risk and vulnerable to the desires and urges of adult men.

Justin Trudeau sits with a majority government right now and could change the law and make it illegal for an adult male to have sex with a minor.

Rona Ambrose’s Conservative Party of Canada had a majority government and they never passed a law to protect minor girls from adult male sexual predators.

None of the NDP have called for any changes to the law.

I am not concerned about:

  • how embarrassed the senate is by the actions of Don Meredith;
  • how the senate can’t withstand another scandal.

What I am concerned about is:

  • all of the other minor girls that remain vulnerable to adult male predators;
  • all of the parents who will find no help within Canada’s legal system protect their children adult male predators;
  • that not one political party or politician has called for a change in the law that protects minor girls from adult male predators.

If the law had been changed years ago:

  • I would not have been helpless while an adult male had sex with my minor daughter;
  • Celine Dion’s mother could have stopped the relationship between her minor; daughter and an adult man, that she was concerned about and did not approve of;
  • The senate would have no problem removing Don Meredith, because he would be in jail for breaking the law.

Changing the senate rules may be out of reach without opening up the constitution, but changing the law is not. Changing the law, just requires the political will to do so.

If Senator Don Meredith resigned tomorrow, only the senate would win, because his removal from the senate would do nothing to protect minor girls from being preyed on.

 Talk is cheap! Action is required to save lives!

 

 

Posted in abuse, abuse of power, Authority figures and Parents Who Sexually Abuse children, Canada, Child Abuse, Child Abuse, Government, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , ,

Justin Trudeau, “You have been weighed, you have been measured, and you have been found wanting”


The need to do the right thing by Prime Minister Justin Trudeau has never been greater than it is now! It is time for Justin Trudeau to step up to the plate, use what seems to be all party consent and call out Donald Trump for being the dangerous pathological liar, misogynist, racist that he is.  Prime Minister, Justin Trudeau, the self-proclaimed feminist, is a hypocrite and a coward, when it comes to standing up for the rights of women and girls.

As Liberal Leader Justin Trudeau said he removed Quebec MP Massimo Pacetti and Newfoundland MP Scott Andrews from caucus, because their accusers, one of whom approached him personally, deserved the benefit of the doubt. When asked why he did not wait for all the evidence to be in, and let due process of law take its course as not to unfairly punish and ruin the careers, reputations and lives of liberal MPs Massimo Pacetti and Scott Andrews, based solely on unproved allegations from accusers wishing to remain anonymous, Trudeau said:

  • “It’s 2014. We have a duty to protect and encourage individuals in these situations to come forward.”
  • “The action must be fair, but decisive. It must be sensitive to all affected parties, but, recognizing how difficult it is to do so, it must give the benefit of the doubt to those who come forward.”
  • “I am aware of how difficult it is for people to come forward. I believe strongly that those of us in positions of authority have a duty to act upon allegations of this nature.”

Why is Donald Trump, a self-admitted violator of women, entitled to what seems like community service from Trudeau in 2017? (Their joint initiative to empower women) Justin Trudeau is not and has never been a feminist, in my humble opinion. Trudeau’s ousting of Quebec MP Massimo Pacetti and Newfoundland MP Scott Andrews from caucus was a cold and calculated political decision made by Trudeau to make him look like a feminist and garner the support of women voters.  Justin Trudeau is not willing to sacrifice himself personally, or politically to create a better world for women and girls. He has proven this by:

  • by throwing Quebec MP Massimo Pacetti and Newfoundland MP Scott Andrews under the bus without waiting for due process;
  • refusing to publicly denounce Donald Trump’s past and continued misogynist behavior;

What would be enough for the prime minister to denounce Trump’s misogynist behavior?  Would Prime Minister Justin Trudeau act if President Donald Trump, was misogynistic with:

  • an ordinary Canadian citizen?
  •   a member of the Canadian press?
  • one of his female MP’s?
  • one of his female cabinet ministers?
  • a female politician?
  • a female member of his family?
  • his wife?

I ask what it would take for the prime minister to act, because nothing that Donald Trump has done in the past or present compels Justin Trudeau to speak out, or act like he felt compelled to do in 2014, when he removed Liberal MPs Massimo Pacetti and Scott Andrews from caucus.

What message is Trudeau sending to the women and girls of Canada and the world about his and Canada’s stance on their equality and right to live without fear of sexual harassment at home, play and in the work place?

When Trudeau was asked by a reporter how he explained the worst aspects of Trump’s behavior during the campaign — his occasional bigotry, misogyny, and racism — to his 7-year-old daughter Ella-Grace, he did not respond to the question. Instead he said, “It’s important that the prime minister and the president have a constructive working relationship”.

I think both Canadians and Americans can only evaluate the importance and constructiveness of the working relationship between the Prime Minister of Canada and the President of the United States of America by looking at how open, transparent and honest the dialogue is. I would say that if Prime Minister Justin Trudeau must set aside what are supposed to be his and Canada’s core values, for the “privilege” of maintaining a constructive working relationship with the president of the USA, then the price to be paid is too high.

Justin Trudeau makes a lot of pretty speeches about inclusiveness, gender equality, LGBTQ rights and the right of all people with the emphasis on women and girls to be able to live without fear of being abused in any way, including sexually, but talk is cheap. The only thing that Justin Trudeau seems willing to do to advance the rights of women and girls is sacrifice a few subordinates in the work place. Justin Trudeau hides behind his job title and what he claims Canadians expect him to do. Doing so, allows him to sidestep and refuse to stamp out inequality, discrimination, persecution and sexual abuse of women and girls, as he promised to before he became the Prime Minister of Canada. When it comes to Donald Trump, Justin Trudeau seems content to take the advice of the three wise monkeys. To this end, Trudeau has decided it is better for himself and Canada to pretend to see no evil, hear no evil and speak no evil of Donald Trump.

In closing I would like to say this, “Prime Minister Justin Trudeau you:

  • are not a feminist;
  • do not stand up for women’s and girl’s rights always;
  • are not willing to put yourself on the line to see that women and girls are treated with respect, dignity, equality;
  • have been weighed, you have been measured, and you have been found wanting.
Posted in abuse of women, Authority figures and Parents Who Sexually Abuse children, Canada, Canada USA relations, Canandian Politicians, Government, Uncategorized, United States of America | Tagged , , , , , , , ,

Talk Is Cheap! Action Is What Saves Lives!


me-5What did the rest of the world’s inhabitants do so wrong that whatever power that was responsible for what happens on this earth allowed Europeans the power to sail to other inhabited lands.  European have always thought themselves to be superior to all others and their descendants still believe this to be true. The descendants of Europe have changed very little in this regard. Europeans and their descendants are always talking about how they will change, but everyone knows that talk is cheap and only action will save lives.

Europeans and their descendants have forced their religion, languages, culture, values as well as their version of civilization on every indigenous people they encountered throughout history.  They came, they said, “Seeking peace and trade”, but what they did was conquer, rape, pillage and enslave.   Canadians of European descent were and are no different. Canadian history shows what I say to be true and recent events and attitudes of, “Real Canadians” in 2017, bears witness to the truth of this statement as well.

European contact with Canadian indigenous people was worse than the Black Death.  Canada’s European colonists with the aid of lies and superior weaponry tried to assimilate all life that it encountered in Canada. The indigenous people were stripped of their hunter gatherer way of life, religious beliefs, values, languages, and cultural habits…all considered the ways of savages, by the Europeans.  Nothing was sacred to Canada’s European forefathers and nothing is sacred to their ancestors.

Europeans and their prodigy were and are like the “Borg”, with one exception. With the Borg, when you become one of them you are one of them. With Europeans, however, if you cannot trace your bloodline back to Europe, and you are not of the white race, you can never really be one of them. What you became in the past is the same as what you become today, and that was and is, assimilated. A person stripped of their own identity, culture, religion, language, personnel feelings and ambition. A worker in the hive. Your only purpose to work for the collective.

Canadian politicians openly speak of all Canadians and real Canadians. All Canadians being those born here in this country, or who have taken the oath of Canadian citizenship. Real Canadians being those sharing European heritage, languages, religion, values, cultural ethnicities, and are a member of the White race.

Canada is and has never been an open and inclusive society. Canada needs to change. Talk is cheap and minorities are being mistreated every day, all over Canada.  In 2017 the targets of Canadian politicians, news agencies and Real Canadians are Canadian Muslims.  What will it take for those responsible for keeping all Canadians safe to take the threat to Canadian Muslims seriously?  It is painfully obvious that before the murder of six Muslim men and the injury of eight others in Quebec, Canadian Muslims did not receive equal treatment under the laws of Canada. This is what I mean:

Six Muslim men were killed praying on their knees in a Mosque in Quebec not long ago.  Oh, what a great spectacle came of it. Politicians of all stripes, on all levels used the murders to show themselves and their political parties as inclusive and denounced the acts as not in keeping with Canadian values…all vowing to do better to stop Islamophobia in Canada wherever it was found.  Citizens of all faiths, nationalities and cultures marched together and the Canadian news media stated publicly that they would do their best not to promote hateful rhetoric. All that love and inclusiveness did not last even a single month, not a week, or even a couple of days.

Flash forward to today:

The political gain of supporting Muslims in Canada ran out. Except for the Liberal Party of Canada, all other politicians in Ottawa see no valid reason to even entertain a motion that would suggest that Muslims need to be protected from Islamophobia. This is what the descendants of Europe do so well. They try to hide what embarrasses them, bury the problem, deflect and change the context of the conversation. Immigrants who seek equality under the law are made to look like ungrateful ingrates. When all else fails, Canadian politicians and news media will appeal to who they feel are Real Canadians, warning them that immigrants are dangerous. Warning them that if certain immigrant immigration is not controlled Real Canadians are in danger of losing all that they have. They warn that Real Canadians will soon be outnumbered and that means that Real Canadians will lose their power when it comes to the ballot box and who controls the government.  These same politicians and news media will blame those immigrants for all that is wrong with Canada; from a failing economy to security issues.

It is this rhetoric and vitriol that emboldened those who did hateful things to Muslims and their places of worship leading up to the tragedy in Quebec and all the hateful things that have happened to Muslims and their places of worship since the murders. The mere motion…not bill, or a law, but just a motion proposed to protect Muslims is being made controversial in the news on shows like Power Play and Power and Politics and by the NDP and Conservative parties of Canada.  Seems no ,”Real Canadian,” sees the need to protect Muslims from incidents like what happened in:

  • Toronto, Ontario – January 10, 2017 ON, Canada   Anti-Muslim protestors shouted Islamophobic remarks against students and the Muslim community during a Peel District School Board meeting to discuss religious accommodation for Muslim students.    Reported to: Media/NCCM
  • Toronto, Ontario) – January 13, 2017 ON, Canada An anti-Muslim activist uploaded a YouTube video associating a Muslim lawyer and human rights advocate with radicalism. The video, and his subsequent tweet, included a picture of the lawyer with blotches of blood in the background.   Reported to: Peel District School Board/Police/NCCM
  • Québec City, Quebec – January 29, 2017 QC, Canada   A gunman opened fire inside the Islamic Cultural Centre of Quebec during evening prayers, approximately around 8pm. Six people have been killed and several wounded.   The mosque has been targeted several times in the past. A package with a severed pig`s head was left at the doorsteps of the mosque last year, and anti-Muslim flyers were distributed in 2014.  Alexandre Bissonnette, 27, is charged with six counts of first degree murder and five counts of attempted murder.   Reported to: Police/Media
  • Montreal, Quebec – February 3, 2017 QC, Canada   The Khadijah Islamic Centre in Montreal’s Pointe-Sainte-Charles neighborhood was vandalized. Between 7:00 and 8:00 a.m. a window smashed, building been egged and graffiti spray painted.  Reported to: Police/Media, Status: Under investigation as a hate crime’
  • Sherbrooke, Quebec – February 09, 2017 QC, Canada   Threats in a 911 call were made against Mosques in the area, as well as Sherbrooke and Quebec City Mayors.    Reported to: Media/Police    Status: Police have made an arrest.

Iqra Khalid, Liberal MP is receiving racial slurs and threats over her motion, (Motion 103) calling on Parliament to condemn Islamophobia and all forms of racism. here are a few that she read into the record in the house of commons replacing the expletives with the word “blank,”:

  • “Why don’t you get out of my country?”
  • “Real Canadians will rise up and get rid of the nasty blank Muzzie stench in Ottawa. They should all go the blank back to your blank hole where you belong. We will burn down your mosques draper head Muslim”
  • “Why did Canadians let her in? Ship her back” “Why don’t you get out of my country? You’re a disgusting piece of trash and you are definitely not wanted here by the majority of actual Canadians”
  • “You’re a cultural Marxist. Inclusivity blank trying to ruin Canada. Blank you gently with a chainsaw, you camel-humping terrorist incubator blank”
  • “Shoot this blank”

My point is: The proud European heritage and values of which Canada boasts, is not inclusive, and does nothing to promote multiculturalism in any true sense.  Politicians like Jason Kenney can run around in Muslim head ware and march in all of the cultural parades he wants, but he will never be able to deny that he was an instrumental player in a government responsible for the arrest and detention incommunicado of over 450 Sri Lankan refugees seeking asylum in Canada. Many of them women and young children, who he claimed were jumping the line.

If politicians the likes of Steven Blaney and Kellie Leitch can find a place in a mainstream Canadian political party like the Conservative Party of Canada to espouse their bigoted views, Muslims and other immigrants not of European decent will never be considered, “Real Canadians”.

When politicians, media and ordinary Canadians begin to slip back into old Canadian populist views and actions not even a month after six Muslim men were murdered and eight others seriously injured, it is safe to say that motion 103 was justified.

The motion, known as M-103, was debated Wednesday in the House of Commons.   Conservative MPs, expressed fears that M-103 could stifle legitimate debate about issues like sharia law and the niqab. In today’s Canada, what a Muslim woman chooses to wear in public is considered a more important discussion than protecting Muslim Canadians from crimes of hatred.

It is my understanding that a good man like Irwin Cotler said the word Islamophobia should be taken out of M-103, so it could get broader consent. I wonder if Irwin Cotler would be willing to take out the words Anti Semitism when talking of a motion to protect Canadian Jews from hate crimes?

I believe that the words Islamophobia and Anti-Semitism need not exist at all,if all Canadians were treated equally under the laws we have right now in Canada, but we know that right now in Canada, that this is just not the case.

Talk is cheap! Action is what saves lives!

Can anyone tell me just one instance where contact with Europeans has benefited anyone but the Europeans on any continent? Asia, North America, South America, Australia, Africa all saw their indigenous people enslaved, their lands looted of their natural resources and wealth. Ancient cultures, languages, religions and ways of life forced from them replaced by everything European. Name one country on those continents throughout history that was not looted, raped and pillaged and enslaved.

Now tell me what  has changed in today’s world.

 

Posted in abuse of power, Canada, Canadian immigration laws, Canadian Justice System, Canadian News Shows, Canandian Politicians, ethnoside, Government, Quebec, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , ,

All Canadians Responsible For The Dead And Injured Muslim Men Of Quebec


me-5Canadian Politicians, members of the media, law enforcement, and ordinary citizens, are all responsible in some way for the killing and injuring of Canadian Muslims in Quebec.  Make no mistake not one Canadian of voting age can claim to be innocent.  All Canadians are guilty, because whatever they have done, or failed to do, did not stop the deaths of six innocent Muslim men, on their knees, praying in their place of worship.

Canadian Politics 101:

  • Since there has been a Canadian government, Canadian politicians have been creating immigration laws and policies that are discriminatory and racist towards one minority or another.
  • It is also very Canadian for our politicians and press to blame the USA for what we do not want to take responsibility for, like why the six Muslim men were slain,
  • Canadian politicians and press keep suggesting that perhaps Trump and his crazy policies had something to do with the dead and injured in these senseless acts of violence.

I say, not so fast. Let’s look at Canada’s past and how far Canadian governments have come in terms of improving immigration laws, policies and the treatment of immigrants and refugees, before absolving Canadians and Canadian politicians of guilt. 

Canada’s immigration record from 1885-2017:

  • The Chinese Immigration Act, 1885, 1900, 1903 combined with federal legislation and municipal ordinances that restricted employment opportunities even in industries to only those not desirable to white Canadians, such as laundries. As if this was not bad enough, the Canadian government topped all the other acts with the Chinese Immigration Act 1923, better known as the Chinese Exclusion Act. It, replaced prohibitive fees with a ban on Chinese immigration to Canada with the exceptions of merchants, diplomats, students, and “special circumstances” cases. The Chinese that entered Canada before 1924 had to register with the local authorities and could leave Canada only for two years or less. The Chinese immigration Act, 1923 was not repealed until 1947
  • The Canadian government had an unofficial policy of restricting immigration by Black people until 1911. In 1911, Prime Minister Wilfrid Laurier formalized this policy with these words, “His excellency in Council, in virtue of the provisions of Sub-section (c) of Section 38 of the Immigration Act, is pleased to Order and it is hereby Ordered as follows: For a period of one year from and after the date hereof the landing in Canada shall be and the same is prohibited of any immigrants belonging to the Negro race, which race is deemed unsuitable to the climate and requirements of Canada.”  Canada maintained its restrictions of immigration until 1962, when racial rules were eliminated from the immigration laws.
  • The forced relocation of the Africville residents occurred between 1964 and 1967. The last house was bulldozed January 2, 1970
  • The turning away of the Komagata Maru from Hong Kong. It arrived off Vancouver in 1914, with 376 passengers on board.  Most of them were Sikhs from India. They were denied entry due to immigration laws at the time.
  • In 1939, 907 Jewish refugees aboard the German transatlantic liner St. Louis, sought sanctuary from Nazi Germany in Canada. Canada refused to take them in and the ship sailed back to Europe, where 254 would later die in concentration camps.
  • The internment of 22000 Japanese Canadians during the 2nd world war. Families were separated, businesses, homes and other property taken from them.
  • In 2010 Immigration Minister, Jason Kenney, had 492 Tamil refugees ( Muslim men, women and children) found aboard the ship, MV Sun Sea, who were seeking asylum in Canada, arrested and detained;  rewrote Canadian immigration law so that the Tamil refugees could be held incommunicado, denying them fair and timely access to hearings and the court process; ignored that the Tamil refugees were fleeing persecution, and a country engaged in a bitter civil war;  told Canadians that all must get in line, because Canada could not afford cost of taking in refugees such as found on the MV Sun Sea, while he personally helped gay men escape Iran and made it possible for them to jump the immigration waiting list,( starting a year earlier and continuing all through 2010);
  • In 2012 The conservative Party of Canada under the leadership of Stephen Harper use their majority government status to force into law Bill C-31: An Act to amend the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act, the Balanced Refugee Reform Act, the Marine Transportation Security Act, the Department of Citizenship and Immigration Act and Bill C-24, or Citizen Act.  All of them are acts that unfairly targeted Muslim people seeking to immigrate to Canada, or attempting to seek asylum in Canada as refugees.
  • It is now 2017, six Muslim men are gunned while on their knees, heads down praying in a mosque in Quebec. The prime minister gives pretty speeches and condemns the senseless violence calling it an act of terrorism. Prime Minister Trudeau and the Liberal Party have been in power for a year with a majority government and have not repealed, or changed anything in any of the acts forced through by the Conservative Party of Canada during their ten years in power, which have been hugely responsible for the anti-Muslim sentiment and Islamophobia seen across Canada today.

Sadly, the only things that have changed from the year 1885 years right up to today in the whole immigration issue are, what immigrants are being unfairly treated by the Canadian government, and what excuse is offered for the necessity of it.

The Conservative Party of Canada seems to believe that spreading anti Muslim rhetoric is okay if you are running for the leadership of their party.  They did not block members of their party from running for their party’s leadership because certain candidates proposed policies were not in keeping with the values of the Conservative Party of Canada, like:

  • Kellie Leitch, who would if she became Prime Minister of Canada, give immigrants a Canadian values test;
  • Steven Blaney who would if he became Prime Minister of Canada, put a limitation on how many Muslims can immigrate to Canada.

The Liberal Party under the leadership of Justin Trudeau has done nothing to right the wrongs done to immigrants and refugees by Stephen Harper. Stephen Harper’s anti Muslim immigration laws have not been repealed. This despite the Liberal Party of Canada enjoying a majority government. Obviously in 2017 equality for all under Canadian immigration law is not a priority of the Liberal Party of Canada. Pretty speeches do however seem to be, as shown by the prime minister in Quebec after the horrid actions of a single gunman.

On the provincial level, Quebec has been rightly singled out as being one of the most racist places on the planet.

  • The Party Quebecois under the leadership of Pauline Marois tried to pass the Quebec Charter of Values, which for the most part targeted Muslims.
  • Philippe Couillard gave a very passionate and touching speech to show sympathy and to assure Muslims that they were equal under the law and safe and at home in Quebec.  Unfortunately, this is the same Philippe Couillard, who introduced Bill 62, the Liberals’ version of the Party Quebecois’ controversial secularism charter, which was introduced in 2013 but not implemented after the party lost the 2014 election.

On the federal and provincial level Canadian politicians are willing to promote anti Muslim sentiment for political gain. Muslims have become a political football for provincial and federal politicians. Both sets of politicians are guilty of creating an environment for Islamophobia to flourish for a very long time. An environment that made possible what happened in Quebec.

News agencies have done their part to spread the fear of certain immigrants throughout the history of Canada. Far too often they choose to report political rhetoric and bold-faced lies told by politicians, that make immigrants and refugees guilty for everything that is going wrong in Canada.  Canadian media is guilty of maintaining the environment required for mistrust, fear and hatred of Muslims and other minorities, in order maintain and grow their market share. No longer can the press claim to be uncorrupted and the true voice of the common man.

Reporting the news is big business. As profit and market share became the focus of news agencies, journalistic integrity and being the voice of the common man flew out the window. We now have right-wing news and left-wing news agencies espousing their opinion on the news events. What we no longer have is anyone just reporting the news.  What is passing for legitimate news coverage now are shows like CBC’s, Power and Politics and CFCF’s, Power Play.

Law enforcement: This bunch has done its part to enforce racist, unfair laws without protest. All too often they do their job with unnecessary brutality and cruelty…seeming to relish the chance to hurt and lord over those who have been targeted by the government for special treatment.

The mosque in Quebec had been vandalized, threatened, had a bleeding pig’s head left on its entrance way and yet the police failed to do anything to secure the premises. Muslim women were punched in the face, spit on, assaulted verbally on busses, a turban wearing man was viciously beaten on a public street by white youths and police refused to consider the incidents as hate crimes, or terrorist acts.  On the other hand, if anybody vandalizes a synagogue, beats up a Jewish person for wearing a Yakama, the police are quick to call it a hate crime. I think that  consistently not finding the evidence needed to proceed with the right charges is a statement that speaks volumes in terms of how fair and equal the justice system and law enforcement treat all citizens of Quebec.

Unfortunately, in Quebec hate crimes and terrorist acts are charges used strictly for deaths caused by Muslims, or those considered to be sympathetic to Muslims.

Canadian citizens: Some Canadian citizens are guilty of promoting mistrust, fear, and hatred of Muslims. Some are guilty of acting on the mistrust, fear, and hatred. Some are guilty of ignoring the racist behavior that they witness, and then gathering in solidarity only after people are killed.  Some believe despite what history proves, that there is nothing wrong with Canada’s immigration laws, either past or present, leaving nothing to change. Some, like Stephen Harper believe what makes a Canadian citizen a “real Canadian” is a person’s origin of birth, religion, language, and culture, and not the oath of allegiance that every immigrant and refugee must swear before becoming a Canadian citizen.

Where does that leave Canada?  Canada will keep on selling out its minorities as long as new reporters, political pundits, and politician insist that:

  • it is crucial that Prime Minister Trudeau does not directly challenge, or denounce Trump’s, racist and discriminatory immigration law for fear that such a criticism could mean a loss of trade between the two countries, doing harm to Canada’s economy; Canada has always been and will continue to be a country where immigrants regardless of their ethnicity are welcomed and can feel safe from persecution and find equality under the law;
  • that it is more important to continue the trading relationship the United States of America than it is to adhere to and stick up for what Canadian politicians claim are Canada’s core principles and values.

More importantly though  nothing will change for immigrants, refugees and minorities in Canada as long as Canadian citizens buy into it and mistreat and even put to death other Canadians, because they are different.

Making pretty speeches like our politicians showed after the six innocent, praying Muslim men were slain and others were critically injured while praying in a mosque  in Quebec, is just not doing enough.

Until the oath taken by immigrants makes them as Canadian as someone born in Canada, nothing will change.

 

 

 

Posted in Canada, Canadian immigration, Canadian immigration laws, Canadian Justice System, Canadian News Shows, Canandian Politicians, Quebec, Quebec's Abuse of Its None Quebecoise Residents (Other Canadians), Racism, Religious Freedom, Terrorism, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , ,

Americans Elect A President Who Is Listed As A Threat To Human Rights


mr-tweety1-jpgbme-5What does it say about the American Republican Party that they allowed a man like Donald Trump to be their candidate for the presidency of the United States of America? The Republican Party of the United States of America should be hanging its collective head in shame. It is this political party’s all-consuming lust for power that gave Donald Trump’s campaign legitimacy and a platform from which to spew his rhetoric.  Donald Trump should have been forced to run as an independent. Perhaps Donald Trump would have still won the election, but the Republican Party could have said that they did the right thing.  

  Despite  Donald Trump:

  • bad mouthing the party;
  • making racist remarks;
  • insulting allied leaders;
  • insulting a gold star veteran’s family;
  • making fun of the handicap;
  • being shown on video admitting that he thought that his celebrity gave him license to assault women, the seduction of power and need to be  in control of the government proved too great a temptation for the Republicans to resist. 

For their failure to do the right thing the Republican Party can look forward to having their party image dragged through the mud for the next four years. They will also be remembered as the political party that elected a president mentioned in “World Report 2017.”  Unfortunately for them, Human Rights Watch listed President-elect Donald Trump as a threat to human rights for “politics of intolerance.”

Everything about Donald Trump’s path to the White House from the campaign, to the winning the election, has been a mirror image of everything that is wrong in the United States of America. There is no mistake that Donald Trump will become the forty-fifth president of the USA. Unfortunately Donald Trump’s way of thinking and acting out represents what far too many Americans consider to be a success story. Donald Trump is the kind of person you end up with when you force feed every American from the time they are born that they are superior to all others on the planet and that nothing matters except what is good for the USA.

To too many Americans, success is judged by the size of one’s bank account, the size of one’s house, the school one’s child attends. There is nothing in the American success story that encourages, empathy for others, fair business practices, honesty, or being fair with one’s employees.  Most Americans are brought up to understand that it is a dog eat dog world and if you want to get ahead and be considered a success, then you must be willing to sacrifice your humanity and be willing to step on everyone in your way to the top.  Americans from the time they are old enough to understand are taught that where success is concerned there is no room for friends. Americans see everything and everyone as a tool to be used to get them what it is they want out of life. To too many Americans, diplomacy, negotiating and honor have become weaknesses not strengths: nice traits if you are content remaining an average Joe.

When questioned about whether or not Donald Trump’s misogynistic behavior exposed on an aired video would affect his willingness to vote for Donald Trump, one of his supporters said that it would not, because, “Every American family had a least one man in just like Donald Trump in it”.

Most American feel that the only way for them to get to the top is to do whatever it takes to amass as much wealth as possible, even if that means:

  • tax evasion;
  • misogynistic behavior;
  • not telling the truth; 
  • under paying employees;
  • putting employee’s health and lives at risk;
  • engaging in unethical business practice.

With the American people believing that this is how one must behave to get to the top and stay there, how can anyone be surprised that nothing Donald Trump has done in his past would bother enough people in the USA to keep them from voting for him?

Donald Trump’s victory will be the first time the people of United States of America chose to elect a person who:

  • when addressing the unnecessary killing of unarmed black men by police says, “It is time to give police back the power to do their jobs without fear.”;
  • has absolutely no idea of what it takes to be the president of the United States of America;
  • has accepted the word of a foreign leader like Vladimir Putin, as well as the hacker, accused rapist and fugitive Julian Assange, over that of the intelligence agencies sworn to protect and serve the USA, like the NSA, FBI, and CIA;
  • has proved that he cannot keep his word either in his personal life, or business dealings;
  • has proved that he has absolutely zero respect for women; and minorities;
  • has no respect for the leaders of countries, which happen to be proven allies of the USA;
  • has no intention on honoring treaties be they trade, defense, or environmental that he feels does not make the USA the only winner;
  • will abandon the USA’s allies in Syria by joining forces with Putin and Assad;
  • cannot stop acting like a spoilt child…pouting, arguing and whining on Twitter every time he does not get his way, or someone tells the truth about him that he does not want exposed.

Whether or not Trump was caught on tape doing something he shouldn’t, or whether his need to become the president of the USA meant literally at any cost, doesn’t really matter.  What does matters is that for the first time in the history of the United States of America there are serious doubts about whether the office of the presidency has been compromised by a foreign government and the actions and words of the incoming president are doing nothing to alleviate that fear.

It has to be almost impossible for the allies of the USA to trust Donald Trump when he:

  • tweets nothing but admiration and praise for Vladimir Putin and only his disappointment and what he sees as the failings of allied leaders;
  • states publicly in interviews his intention to fight alongside Russia in Syria, which would mean against the coalition of nations that the USA calls its allies;
  • expresses his intention to withdraw the USA from NATO, because he feels that NATO is obsolete;
  • publicly states his willingness to drop the USA’s sanctions on Russia, without Russia giving back Crimea to the Ukraine;
  • shows a total disrespect for the leaders of countries the USA is supposed to consider valued partners such as, Canada’s Justin Trudeau and Germany’s Angela Merkel.

Donald Trump has tweeted that he always knew that Putin was a smart guy. Is what Donald Trump finds smart about Putin the way he:

  • Took Crimea by military force from Ukraine?
  • Is able to kill off his political rivals and those who speak out against his methods of governance and get away with it?
  • Supports militarily president Assad of Syria?
  • Supports Assad’s usage of chemical weapons on his own people?
  • Is partially responsible for the greatest forced migration of people since the Second World War?

I will end with a quote from Emily Crockett… “America had a choice between its first woman president and an alleged sexual predator; between “women’s rights are human rights” and “grab ’em by the pussy”; between telling our daughters they can do anything they want, and telling them that anything can be done to them by powerful, entitled men. We know which option America chose.” “The only “bubble” that’s been popped is the one that had some people convinced misogyny was already over, or at least well on its way out the door.”

Posted in abuse of power, abuse of women, Amercan presidential election, Canada USA relations, ethnoside, Government, Racism, stereotyping, Uncategorized, USA election | Tagged , , ,

“Friends Do Not Take Friends To The United Nations Security Council”


me-5Benjamin Netanyahu is feeling betrayed these days, because the United States did not use its veto to block the United Nations Security Council resolution which states that, “Israel’s settlements in the West Bank and east Jerusalem, have “no legal validity” and constitute a “flagrant violation of international law”. 

I am sure that:

  • the leaders of Great Britain have felt  betrayed throughout the years by Israel’s refusal to live within the terms of the agreement that Great Britain helped force upon the Palestinians.  In reality the majority of the Jews of Europe at that time had about as much right to demand that a homeland be given them in the Middle East, as North American Blacks have to demand that a homeland be given them in Africa today; 
  • Israel through the years has caused the USA and all of the nations that have supported Israel financially, militarily and politically to feel a sense of  betrayal as Israel took their help and used it to become the major cause of death in the Middle East;
  • all of the nations that keep asking for Israel to give back the land in now occupies illegally on the West bank and in east Jerusalem feel betrayed by Israel’s constant refusal to do so;
  • the  nations responsible for the  creation of Israel and its continued protection, at great expense to their nations, are tired of being publicly insulted by Israeli leaders who all too often seem to forget by whose hand they have come to have a homeland in the first place, and without whose continued financial, military and political support, the state of Israel would cease to exist. 

Benjamin Netanyahu does not care:

  • how heinous the documented crimes are that Israel has committed against innocent Muslims;
  • how many innocent people have suffered and continue to suffer under the weight of Israeli oppression;
  • how many civilian targets Israel has intentionally targeted, or how many innocent Muslims were lost as a result of such targeting.

Benjamin Netanyahu does not care about any of these things, because he believes that:

  • there are any no innocent living Muslims; 
  • all Muslims are the enemy of Israel;
  • all Muslim children are enemies of Israel in waiting.
  • this makes all Muslims legitimate military  targets.

 Hitler felt the same way about the European Jews and many other similarities can be drawn that put Israel and its dealings with the Palestinians on the same disgusting page as Nazi Germany.

 To Benjamin Netanyahu:

  • only Israel has the right to defend it’s homeland;
  • Palestinians should forget that Israel was created on land that was once their homeland;
  • any action to get their land back that was stolen from them and given to the European Jews, should be deemed terrorism.

Israeli leaders tend to forget that without:

  • Great Britain and France there would be no Israel;
  • the unconditionally support of Great Britain, France and the USA, Israel could not have survived its first year and without those nations continued financial, military and political support, Israel will fall.

The USA, France and Great Britain are starting to see the monster that they have created in the Middle East.  Israel has broken every treaty it has signed with the Palestinians. Israel has deliberately broken international laws and gotten away with it so often, because of the USA’s veto power on the United Nations Security Council, that they feel betrayed by the USA’s vote abstention.  Israel has made fools of their allies and a mockery out of every decent thought that went into making their dream of a nation a reality. 

Israel has proved what the Palestinians feared and all of their neighbors knew to be true:

  • Israeli leaders would not be satisfied with the land they were given by the west.
  • Israeli leaders would seek to expand the territory they were given based on the claim that you cannot be accused of stealing, when you take back what rightfully is yours in the first place.

The only problem with the land is mine anyway theory is that it based solely on a religious story told in a Jewish holy book. The Palestinians do not believe that God gave the Jews all of the land no matter who was on it.  God cannot be called as a witness to testify that he gave the Jewish people the land.  So how can Israel, or any other nation expect the international community to take seriously any claim of legal and historical right to land occupied by another people based on a self-serving story, found only in that people’s holy book…in this case one written by Jews? Impossible would have to be your response, and yet that is exactly the pretext that was used to give the Jews of Europe a part of Palestine as a homeland, and has allowed for the mess that is now the Middle East.

 Israeli leaders have lied about keeping the east and west occupied lands as safe zones only…not only allowing for Jewish settlements to be built on land, but encouraging such settlements that have “no legal validity” and constitute a “flagrant violation of international law”.

Unconditional support for Israel has emboldened Israeli leaders. Netanyahu has become increasingly brazen in his demeaning rhetoric of the USA and all of Israel’s allies, who feel that they can no longer pretend not to see that Israel is the major impediment to peace in the middle East. So nasty is Netanyahu’s rhetoric against Israel’s benefactors, that ill-informed people might actually believe that the state of Israel no longer requires financial, military and political support to survive in the hell on earth they have helped to create in the Middle East.

Benjamin Netanyahu has demonstrated by his suspension of business with the twelve nations that voted in favor of the resolution that he demands nations claiming to be friends of Israel must be willing to:

  • turn a blind eye to the illegality of settlements;
  • agree that the existence of does not make a two state solution impossible to achieve.

Those on the suspended list are for supporting what he and Israel are calling an anti-Israel resolution are, Britain, France, Russia, Japan, Angola, Uruguay, Senegal, China, Ukraine, Egypt, Spain and New Zealand.

The United Nations Security Council resolution that Netanyahu claims is anti-Israel says, “Israel’s settlements in the West Bank and east Jerusalem, have “no legal validity” and constitute a “flagrant violation of international law”.

If the truth were to be told:

  • The creation of Israel on land belonging to others by the west got the whole mess started in modern times.
  • The west being unwilling, or unable to stop Israel’s illegal expansion has fueled Islamic terrorist reactions.
  • A guilty west affording Israel unconditional support hoping to atone for the holocaust has caused the hatred t racist violence of the Middle East to infest and infect the rest of the world.
  • Israel’s ability to use western guilt to obtain nuclear weapons and defense systems have made them a danger to world peace and stability.
  • Israel is a rogue nuclear state that needs to be disarmed before they do what they said they would if they thought that Israel was in danger of losing a war it not only started, but is fueling the fire to daily.

The efforts to end the Palestinian/Israeli conflict embodies all in modern diplomacy that I detest. When international leaders unconditionally support and protect a nation that they have the power to stop from committing genocide and all manner of crimes against humanity as is the case in the Palestinian/Israeli conflict, because of a technicality in terminology, military positioning, or because of some misguided sense of loyalty, I say that they are as guilty of the crimes as the actual perpetrator of them.

Britain, France, Russia, Japan, Angola, Uruguay, Senegal, China, Ukraine, Egypt, Spain and New Zealand, whom Netanyahu has freed from the bondage of doing business with him and Israel should be glad that they have been set free, and released from their previous ill-conceived sense of loyalty and obligation to him and Israel. These listed states should move quickly to distance themselves even further from that maniacal Zionist: turning what was to be temporary political posturing by Netanyahu into a long-term reality for Israel. It is from this freedom that I believe those states listed could continue to do the right thing. The latest UN Security Council resolution was a good beginning, but now they need to hold Israel accountable for its illegal activities which include attempted genocide, war crimes and crimes against humanity.

I must say that I agree with Trump when he said, “such great potential,” but it has become “just a club for people to get together, talk and have a good time. So sad!”  I agree because for years the UN Security Council has allowed the Israeli/Palestinian situation to continue spreading the tentacles of its self-generating, self-fulfilling hatred and racism out to the four corners of the earth.

The innocent people in the area and internationally are those who suffer the most from problems such as this one. Torture, death, disease, murder and the forced migration of millions of innocent people, are what the world will continue to look like, until the UN Security Council not only passes these resolutions that condemn the actions of Israel and rogue states like them, but does everything in its power to enforce them.

I think that it is time for the United Nations Security Council to use multi nation military force against nations when they receive an official response from a leader of a country in violation of one of its resolutions like that given by Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, when he said, “Israel rejects this shameful anti-Israel resolution at the UN and will not abide by its terms.” 

Islamic radicalization and acts of  Islamic terrorism around the world are a direct result of  the so-called free world giving an ungrateful, arrogant state of Israel “unconditional” support.

Posted in Prejudice, Racism, Terrorism, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

“Not My President”, Say Some Democrats. “Yes He Is” Says The Law”.


me-5One of the corners stones of democratic governance is that the population of a country must be provided a system by which its citizenry can elect who will govern them. The only guarantee that a democracy affords politicians and private citizenry where government elections are concerned, is that elections be held according to the laws of the country.

We all know this to be true, so why are Americans who are not happy with who won the last presidential election rioting, protesting and looking for ways to get around what was so obviously a fair election according to the laws of the United States of America?  Why are so many Americans saying, “Not my president, “when the law of the land clearly says that he is? A lot of Americans appear to be saying, “We believe in the democratic process, as long as our candidate wins, and is in control of the country”.   

American citizens from all walks of life spout patriotic rhetoric the like of no other citizenry in the free world.  They all insist that the deaths of millions of innocent people caused by the violence of war like disease, starvation and force mass migration are a justifiable price for those people to pay for their freedom and their chance to live under democratic governance.

The facts are:

  • “Americans are dying in foreign lands to enable the citizens of those countries to enjoy the democratic principles, rights and freedoms that every American citizen enjoys,” say American politicians.  
  • American’s in general seem to feel that going to war with a sovereign nation to bring those democratic principles, rights and freedoms is justified. 
  • One such principle and the very corner-stone of democracy is that every eligible American has the right to vote and to be part of the process that will determine who will govern them. 
  • There is nothing in the Constitution of the United States of America that remotely suggests that the losing side of the election, be they politicians, or private citizenry must like the results of an election.

Why endanger the lives of Americans at home and abroad fighting to gain for others the rights and freedoms guaranteed under democratic governance, when it is clear that Americans do not honor and accept the fundamental tenets of electing a government themselves. 

What is it that I am missing about Donald Trump’s victory that made him the next president of the USA? Did something unfair happen that I am aware of like: 

  • Findings of voter fraud?
  • Voters being denied access to polling stations? 
  • Voter intimidation?
  • Proof that the computer systems that were used were hacked into?

If not, then what is with the:

  • protesting, rioting and other forms of civil disobedience?
  • calls for recounts? 
  • the call to overturn the outcome of the election through “Faithless Electors” process?

It is too late and of little value for the anti-Trump voters to march, protest and riot.  All of it only serves to make a mockery out of the democratic process and render moot the whole democratic process. It would appear that Americans have become the joke of the world with the actions of its candidates throughout the election and the actions of its electorate after the election: both groups casting doubt on the legitimacy of the most fundamental part of the democratic process.

The only way in a democracy to insure that your candidate wins an election is through the voting process. Getting the message of your candidate out, registering to vote and then following through by voting for the candidate of your choice.

Disgruntled American citizens who were eligible to vote and did not should have taken President Obama’s advice and voted for Hillary Clinton to show their displeasure with the prospect having to have Donald Trump as president of the country. 

I have little sympathy for American citizen who chose:

  • not to exercise their franchise and now claim to be afraid, or now feel that they have been left behind;  
  • freely to vote for a third-party and candidate they knew had no chance of winning and now see the error of their ways;
  •   to rig the election themselves by engaging in ballot trading;

American presidential elections have for years been won by candidates who are willing to trash their opponents and their families, rather than addressing how they would do better running the country than their opponents. It no longer matters to American voters whether the trash talk is factual, or who has the better plan for the country, because all the American electorate seem to want is a good show. How else could Americans see with their own eyes and hear with their own ears a man seeking to be the next president of the USA, do and say such nasty, mean-spirited things,  and vote for him anyway?

Didn’t Donald Trump:

  • brag about using his celebrity to sexually take advantage of women?
  • brag about not paying his taxes in years?
  • make racist comment about Mexicans and Blacks?
  • say that he would abandon allies on the battlefield?
  • say that he intends to switch sides and work with Assad and Russia; making Russia and Assad the new allies and the coalition the new enemy and support the enemy?
  • make fun of and mock a disabled person?

Donald Trump did all of those things and every American was aware of it, and yet he won the election promising to reveal his secret plan for making America great again only after and if he won the election.

Hillary Clinton lost to Donald partially because she refused to give the American electorate the show they demanded and instead spoke of her plans to keep America great and revealed how she would do it.  The American electorate found her boring, and punished her at the polls for not entertaining them. 

The American voters for the most part said they could not forgive her for not leaving her disgraced husband, choosing to blamed her for his infidelities. They also said with their vote that they did not care that she had dedicated most of her adult life to:

  • improving the lot of minorities;
  • helping children at home and abroad get a good education;
  • negotiating for the betterment of people suffering under oppressive regimes;

The truth is that no matter how loud they chant, “Not my president,” reality and the law says that Donald Trump will be just that and will be that for approximately four more years, unless:

  • he is denied the presidency through the “Faithless Electors” process;
  • he is impeached at some point in time after he takes office;
  • he becomes too sick, dies, or is found unable to continue with his duties as the president;
  • he is assassinated;
  • the people of the USA make use of their 2nd amendment right to bear arms and do what Donald Trump himself suggested they do if Hillary Clinton won the election.

I do not like Donald Trump, but I do love that he took the call from the Taiwanese presidents, and ignored years of hypocritical, failed diplomatic protocol.  It is this sense of overbearing, failing political correctness that has allowed for the starving and slaughtering and mass forced migration of millions of innocent people.  It is the web of lies that has bound those who say they believe in freedom of all people to live in peace and harmony from speaking out against oppression except in polite terms that solve nothing.

Perhaps it is time for the world leaders to say exactly what they mean instead of hiding behind what is referred to as diplomatic protocol. All that diplomatic protocol has done thus far, is bring the world to the brink of Armageddon.  As the Donald would say, “What have we got to lose”!

 

 

 

 

Posted in abuse of power, Amercan presidential election, Government, Uncategorized, USA election | Tagged , , , , , ,